Keep up-to-date, join in the chat!

Follow us on Instagram

Contact Us


#inov8month – 2018 Race Review


2018 Race Recap!


2018 has been a great year of running for me! I’ve run over 4,000km for the first time ever and had some good results on the road and the fells. Here are some of the key races from my 2018 year of running:


February 18th – Ilkley Moor fell race – Yorkshire Senior and U23 Fell Running Champs

I turned 23 this July so decided to have a final go at the Yorkshire U23 Championships, which this year took place at Ilkley Moor fell race. I had a good run in last year’s champs, finishing 2nd U23, and hoped to build on this. Despite a strong start and being in 6th place at halfway, I faded later on and ended up finishing 12th place and 4th U23, not the start to the season I had hoped for. Read my full report of that race here.

February 25th – Hope Winter fell race

Just a week after the disappointment at Ilkley Moor, I was racing more locally in the Peak District at the Hope Winter fell race. The race follows a fantastic route over Win Hill, with 450m of climb in 10.5km. It was an extremely cold day, with the ground frozen and clear blue skies, making for a fast race. I started off well and soon found myself in a leading pack with 2 other runners, Stu Bond and Billy Cartwright.  We climbed all the way to the summit of Win Hill together, before I managed to take a good line off the top towards the forest below and open up a slight gap on the descent. Hitting the forest, about halfway in at this point, the route flattens off and I continued to work hard to try and maintain the gap I had gained and stay in the lead. However, Billy managed to bridge back across the gap to me, and we ran together from here, taking turns setting the pace. We hit a turn to begin the climb out of the forest and back to the finish field, where I slipped on a frozen puddle and went down on my right knee hard, drawing blood. I got straight back up and worked my way back to Billy, who was kind enough to check I was alright. We vied for position going up this final climb and I hit the top just behind, before storming past as we began the descent; I’d made my move and went for it on the downhill! We flew down the descent, which though not steep was very technical in parts, and despite my best efforts I just couldn’t seem to shake Billy. We left the trail and hit the road for the final kilometre back to the finish field, swapping places as we both tried desperately to drop the other with endless surges and attacks. I felt like my heart was going to explode but knew I couldn’t give in now. We left the road and made our way through a stile, and it was here where Billy got in front of me and I feared the worst. I had ran the finish route prior to the race as part of my warm up so knew what to expect, and decided to just try and stay behind until we reached the last turn, and then sprint for the line. We hit the corner and I burst out to the right of Billy and kicked with everything I had left for the finish funnel – it was just enough! I won in 44:32, just 2 seconds ahead of Billy and 6 seconds off the course record. What a race! After the disappointment of the week before, I was ecstatic to win here.

8th – 10th June – Castleton and Edale fell races

On the weekend of 8th – 10th June, I ran 2 races in the Accelerate Gritstone Series – Castleton fell race on the Friday night, and Edale fell race on the Sunday morning. I had a good run at Castleton, chasing the eventual winner Nathan Lawson alongside Stu Bond. We made good time along the great ridge, and seemed to be closing the gap to Nathan by working together up the climb, but Nathan descended well and the gap was too much to make up. Stu also was too quick for me on the descent, his strength and experience paying dividends which meant I had to keep on working hard on my won to ensure I finished in 3rd place. Despite some confusion at the end with Nathan and Stu finishing in the wrong place, I managed to secure a solid 3rd place against some quality competition. I ran this race in 2015 and finished 33rd in 48:51. In 2018, 3 years on, I managed to finish 30 places better in 43:22, so was very happy with my run here! I had managed to nearly go over on my ankle whilst descending from Hollins Cross however, which made for a nervy Saturday spent at work hoping it would be ok to race on the next day. I went along to Edale on a ridiculously hot summer’s day and warmed up, the ankle feeling ok – I decided to go for it! Edale fell race starts on a steep hill, and climbs ringing roger before traversing along the edge of Kinder Scout. Going up the first climb I was in 2nd place, working hard but trying not to overdo it in the blisteringly hot conditions. I slowed a bit towards the end of the climb, but found myself still in 2nd with a couple of runners close behind. Approaching the summit of Grindlsow Knoll, I was passed by a runner from Matlock AC before beginning the gnarly, technical descent back to the finish. Losing 200m of height in 1km, I ran as fast as I could down the hill but couldn’t quite close the gap to 2nd place, however I placed well on the strava segment for the descent so was happy with that. Running down the road to the finish I kept on pressing to close the gap but there wasn’t enough road so had to settle for 3rd, and was happy to cool down with some water after the race! Two 3rd places in 3 days, all in all a good weekend!

21st July – Snowdon International Mountain Race

July came around and with it my main target race of the year, the Snowdon International Mountain Race in Llanberis, Wales. This race has a long, prestigious history, and attracts a stellar international field each year. To say I was excited to race it is an understatement! The weather for the race wasn’t perfect, some rain the morning of the race had made the rock quite slippy and treacherous for descending. My plan for the race was to go out at a good effort but not too hard, then build the effort as the climb went on, before going for it on the descent. In hindsight, I should maybe have saved a little more for the descent. I felt I climbed really well, starting a bit back from where I wanted to be then beginning to pass people after the first kilometre or so. I kept on working hard and moving up the field, before reaching the steep, stepped section of the route where it was almost all but impossible to not walk. A climb/descent of this length is something I haven’t raced before, so I was pleased with how I paced the climb, reaching the top in 48:50. From here it was just the small matter of almost 5 miles back to the finish! Going back the way we ran up and passing runners coming the other way, plus the large amount of walkers, made for a hair-raising, adrenaline-filled descent. I won’t hide the fact that I had been pretty anxious about the descent prior to the race, given the steepness of some sections and the sheer amount of time I’d be descending for, however I felt like I was doing ok and by the time I had nearly reached the bottom of the trail going up the mountain I had only lost one place. Hitting the road marks around 1 mile to go, and is where I began to run out of steam. I felt like I hadn’t paced it very well at this point as I felt like I was running out of energy and could feel twinges of cramp in my quads and calves. I made it down the ridiculously steep road section and hit the flat, 800m remaining. Here I could hear footsteps behind me and annoyingly 5 other runners came past me in these closing metres, and try as I might I just couldn’t respond. I ended up finishing 33rd, with around 10 seconds separating me from 25th place, demonstrating the depth of quality in this race. I finished in 1 hour and 16 minutes, 9 minutes back from the winner Alberto Vendere from Italy. I was really happy with my race and time, with plenty to work on for next year.


16th Septmber – Stockport 10k

In September I ran my first road race of the year at the Stockport 10k, a big meet-up race for my club Vegan Runners UK. Last year this was one of my best races of the year, being the first race I ever managed to win, running a PB of 34:30 in the process. I was keen to repeat this result this year and had trained hard prior to the race, running a PB of 16:28 over 5k a few weeks beforehand. The route was different to last year, and was now hillier and featured many, many more twists and turns, making for a slower route. I set off conservatively through the streets of Stockport, knowing that the second kilometre was pretty much all uphill. I found myself leading the race, with a chase pack of 3 runners about 5 – 10m behind me. I kept on working hard up the hill, finding the constant twists and turns difficult, sapping any rhythm I had. However I managed to open up a gap and by 5km into the race had a sizeable lead. I knew I just had to keep the effort going and not blow up so concentrated on running efficiently and working hard to make each kilometre split as fast as the last. At 8km into the race, a lorry began doing a multi-point turn across the road that was part of the race route about 100m in front of me. I couldn’t believe it! All sorts of thoughts ran through my head, chiefly that I was going to lose my lead thanks to a random lorry! Fortunately the lead cyclist powered ahead and shouted at the lorry driver to move, which he did just in time for me to squeeze by at one side without breaking my stride. Phew! From here there was one final, steep, short climb up a cobbled street before the final sprint to the finish. It was a great feeling to cross the line first again at this race, especially whilst wearing the Vegan Runners UK vest, showing that vegans can be fast too! It was a great way to end the year of racing.

All in all, it has been a fantastic year of racing for me, with big improvements and a couple of good race wins. Next year I hope to build on these results and performances and keep on improving. I couldn’t have achieved the results I have this year without the support of Accelerate Running Store and Inov8, and am extremely grateful to both for their continued support. I can’t wait for 2019!

#teamaccelerateinov8 #teamaccelerate #runningmadeeasy #getagrip #graphene #trails

Posted in Buzz | Comments Off on #inov8month – 2018 Race Review

Thermoshell Pro Full Zip Women’s Running Jacket – Reviewed



With the winter getting colder and the wind picking up out in the hills it’s time to reach for a warm jacket and get outside.  The Inov8 Thermoshell Pro has quickly become a favourite of mine and is ideally suited to cold outings whether you’re just out walking in the hills or competing in a mountain marathon. It is also my go-to pre/post-race cover up as it delivers warmth without being too bulky.

The Thermoshell uses PrimaLoft Black Insulation ThermoPlume which means it is as soft and compressible as natural goose down but its water-resistant finish means that you stay warm even in wet conditions. This technology gives the coat thermal properties equivalent to 550 fill power down – which is a lot! The outer fabrics are also water-resistant and wind proof which further protects you from harsher conditions.

When moving the jacket fits easily to your form allowing a full range of movement, this means you can hop, skip and jump your way across the mountains. The hood can also be adjusted so that it stays in place whilst you’re moving – keeping your face protected from the elements and the soft inner cuff prevents drafts from sneaking up your sleeves.

The jacket can be packed easily away into an internal pocket and weighs under 400g which makes it the perfect coat for anyone who wants to save on weight but not on warmth.

(the inov-8 Thermoshell Pro is available at the Accelerate Store)

Posted in Buzz | Comments Off on Thermoshell Pro Full Zip Women’s Running Jacket – Reviewed

The difference between GRIP and TRACTION

GRIP – By Friction, the ability to cling onto a surface.

TRACTION – The ability to pull or draw something along.


In essence GRIP is just the ability to cling to stuff.

While TRACTION is the resistance against sliding, when being pulled at (usually while under load).


Grip works when materials are able to stick on mere contact alone, but Traction adds the ability to pull against something and have it stay fixed in place when the Grip might otherwise fail.

And so where running shoes are concerned –

There are sticky rubber outsoles.  And there are harder, more plastic outsoles.

The softer, stickier stuff clings a lot more on contact with the ground, but suffers a lot more wear for being so soft.

The harder/tougher ones take a lot more abuse, but will perhaps fail to cling in wet or uneven areas.

When it comes to off-road running, the ability to stick is still very useful, but it’s more important to keep your feet where you put them (to not have them slide in any direction), so you need some texture under foot, which will allow the shoes to grab into the surface and hold when pulled against.

Sticky rubber pulled across wet grass still tends to slip and slide.  But teeth along the underside of the shoes mean they’ll sink into the mud, gravel, grass, sand, etc and stay in place when you push off.  This is traction in action.

A lot of road shoes have an almost entirely flat underside, allowing maximum contact across the surface of the shoe, for maximum friction –  enhanced by soft sticky rubber when required.  But these same shoes, even with sticky rubber here or there, will slide when used on wet or lose gravelly areas.

Above: inov-8 Road Talon 240 shoes with strategically placed rubber pads, for grip where the foot ought to make brief contact


So smooth for hard flat surfaces… Toothy for anything else.

There are plenty of shoes which offer a low, flat stud for road and easy trails.  There are some which feature much longer, narrower studs, which compromise friction on the flat, in favour of grabbing into softer ground.

Knowing where you’re going to run most of the time and what kind of footwear might suit, makes a huge difference when attempting to move successfully over any particular area.

Depth of cushion is for comfort.  It’s protective against impact.  But it won’t make you a better runner and it won’t stop you slipping when you push uphill, or on the flat.  Nor will it save you from a fall, if you commit to a downhill without sufficient purchase under foot.

Grip then, comes from materials and their nature.  How ‘sticky’ they are when placed on a variety of surfaces.

Traction comes from the design and arrangement of the teeth.  All teeth facing the same way for forwards movement.  In all directions for all-round traction over uneven ground.  Reversed studs at the heel for traction on downhills.  There are plenty of shoes with a mixture of directional studs, for use on hard and soft ground combined.

A few shoes feature such things as metal tips for use on wet mossy rocks, tree roots, fallen limbs or perhaps ice on occasion.  Some have glass fibres in flat studs for use on ice alone.

Some try to cater for a bit of everything, but by their nature, fail to excel in any particular area, when measured against a dedicated shoe which is more niche, but more fit for purpose.

Grip versus Traction is a never ending battle.  Which is why companies produce such a range of shoes.

It’s also why the staff at Accelerate and the runners we support, own what we refer to as a ‘tool box of shoes’.  Since we almost always know what we’ll need on any given run and the footwear that might best provide it.

Grippy shoes with plenty of traction include:  inov-8 Mudclaw 300, which has one of the stickier, grippier rubber outsoles, but also a conical stud which sheds mud more easily to maintain the traction when the mud threatens to fill up the gaps.

Above: the inov-8 Mudclaw 300 with its sticky, yet deep conical studs for combined traction and grip


inov-8 X-Talon 212/230/200, which is still very sticky, but with narrower studs, more distanced, so more effective against grass, which can cause broad studs to slide, despite their depth.

Scott Supertrac Ultra RC, which has a long narrow stud configuration, in zig zags with studs along the edges of the shoes to prevent the collaps that teeth alone can cause when they bend under load.  More friction for multi terrain including road and flagstones, but again, less effective when used in mud and grass.

Saucony Peregrine, which offers a 50/50 split between studs and gaps under foot, but with the addition of a deep midsole which provide a road shoe comfort on hard trails and tarmac.

There really isn’t a shoe which rlies entirely on grip.  And there’s little gain in having a shoe with traction if it slides off everything remotely firm that it comes into contact with.

Cross Country Spikes are among the least grippy things you’ll ever come across, but with up to 15mm of steel spike protruding, you’ll hardly find a better source of traction on flat mud and grass.

Steep terrain demands that you be able to attach yourself to the rocks and roots, the grass and mud and everything else that poses a risk as you hurtle downhill at speed.  So less spike, more stud, with grippier materials which will momentarily allow you to put your foot down and trust it as you focus on where to place the other.

Road shoes require more friction, with almost all of the shoe against the floor for maximum traction, so long as it’s made from something which grips all the same.


For a full description of how different stud arrangements can provide traction on a variety of surfaces, read my previous guide here






Posted in Buzz | Comments Off on The difference between GRIP and TRACTION

31st British & Irish Masters Cross Country Int’ Champs – by Dot Kesterton

Dot Kesterton is no stranger to BUZZ, with plenty of experience, teaching runners half her age how it’s done!

Running for #TeamAccelerate, as well as Sheffield’s Steel City Striders & her local ladies club ‘Smiley Paces’ – she competes within the V60 category (outdoing many in the V50 & V40) and runs like she means it.







31st British and Irish Masters Cross Country International Championships
17th November 2018, Singleton Park, Swansea, Wales.

Report by Dot Kesterton

In the 1967 Cross Country season I was chosen to represent my school, Sir Wilfrid Martineau School in the All Birmingham Cross Country Championships. I set off full of hope and belief in myself, ran a good race and came in as runner-up. I was overjoyed.

Then I was disqualified.

My friend had dropped out early in the race, waited for me and jogged back into the school with me. The disqualification was for ‘pacing.’ I had no idea what pacing was or that I’d broken any rules. To compound my misery the Birmingham newspapers covered the race including my disqualification.

I was 15 years old and athletics was run by officious jobsworths who treated me as if I was a cheat.

I didn’t run competitively again until 2010 when I retired from teaching.

Last Saturday, 51 years after that awful day, I was selected to run for England. I lined up with the best of the British and Irish Masters at a Home International race in Singleton Park, Swansea.  So it was teams from England, Scotland, Northern Ireland, Wales and Republic of Ireland.

The women’s course was 6K over 3 laps and the men’s 8K over 4 laps. . The weather could not have been kinder. It was warm, sunny and still. The going was generally good though in places wet and muddy. It was 314’ elevation in total.

I’d been battling a sore throat and ear infection for a few days before the race but knew I had to give it my all so, dosed up with paracetamol I tussled with the front-runners for a good start position and went off with the gun. It took a few moments to find my pace, dodging elbows and weaving runners. Then it was dig in and give this one everything I’d got for a result.

I tried not to blow up too soon and though breathing was laboured towards the end I held my position to win bronze (28:23) behind Yuko Gordon of England (27:34) and Ann Murray of Scotland (28:03).

My F65 team, Yuko Gordon, Penny Forse, Ros Tabor and I won gold as did the English women and men overall.

Mark McKinstry, M35 of Northern Ireland stormed through to win the men’s title in 25:10 and Teresa Doherty, F40 Ireland 6K in 21:19.

This was my debut as a home international. I’m very happy that at last I have had a chance to run as I should have been allowed to run half a century ago.

I now have to shake off my cold, rest and come back strong to take on the mantle again.

Full result available from the British Masters website.

Posted in Buzz | Comments Off on 31st British & Irish Masters Cross Country Int’ Champs – by Dot Kesterton

BP – Before Power


Running Power… go on then what do you think this actually means?

Power, is nothing new in sporting terms as cyclists have been developing this as a means of training to a high level for some time.  In running it is still very much in its infancy.

Garmin have had an app for a while yet the real pioneers have been Stryd.  When heart rate first came along back in the 80’s and into the 90’s it was a different story.  Take your average sports watch and add in heart rate – away you go.

Then speed and distance came along and really took over as a means of training for many a runner.

So before we even look at ‘Training with Power’, in this entry – let’s take a step back and review what we have today.  And how that fits with improving your fitness.


Heart Rate:

The precise measurement of your heart rate started with an ECG accurate chest strap. They could in fact measure more than just your beats per minute, also the time difference between each beat to help tell you the impact your training was having on your cardio fitness and then your state of recovery – but only from a cardio point of view.
The only reliable way to determine your training zones has never been through some formula but from a Lactate Test or to see a coach who knows how to interpret your racing heart rate trace.

The key thing with heart rate is that it is an accurate ‘rev counter’, giving you a true and precise picture of how hard you are working.  Heart rate does lag behind your activity.  More so the fitter you are – a real problem for short distance runners, especially sprint specialists.

You will notice it most as you change your speed and your heart rate takes a moment to catch up with your increasing effort – often referred to as heart rate ‘lag’.
So training with heart rate is a response to the work you do and it is still the closest we’ve had to monitoring actual workload for years.

In so many ways it is still the most important parameter for accurate and successful training development, especially in moving through the aerobic (process requiring free oxygen/breathing) and anaerobic (operating without use of free oxygen/utilising alternative fuel sources within the body) energy systems – whilst minimising injury risk and over training.

Old School… Heart rate and timing device. The Polar Vantage XL sitting on its docking station having its memory read and uploaded to your Windows 3.1 PC.


This is nothing more than an output of the work you put in.  A measurement of how quickly you cover distance within a unit of time.  It makes no allowance for your state of fatigue (running slower as you go – probably at a higher heart rate than normal).
It is a tool for comparison, not really something to train by – well for most of the time.


Like speed this is again nothing more than an output.  How far you ran for a given unit of time.  In truth, like speed, it’s great to know, yet on any given day we should always be asking ourselves, ‘Can I keep this effort up for the given distance, or time?’.  So there’s ‘Effort’ and using heart rate as a rev counter to help with this.  Altitude, falls into this bracket too.

Heart rate training has a massive benefit over training to speed, especially for ‘recovery’ and ‘aerobic’ into ‘tempo’ runs.

Many still shy away from utilising heart rate training…  But here’s the thing… ‘Cardiac Drift’.  You run to a set speed for ‘aerobic’ benefit, so nothing too taxing, you are out of breath, but still talking. As you run, you fatigue.  Your heart rate climbs and you become increasingly ‘anaerobic’ in you run.  Here, fatigue levels and post run recovery are both exponentially increasing.  As you become more anaerobic your body is attempting to force you back into an aerobic state, it is after all happiest and safest there.

If you had run to heart rate, then as you fatigued you would have only slowed down.  Less fatigue and much less recovery time, which has to be a good thing.  Both the science and anecdotal evidence clearly show that the point at which you slow down in order to maintain heart rate is pushed further and further away when you train to specific training zones.  And if that is the case, then speed is maintained for longer – so your average speed is shown as a much higher output, which is something we all would like.

All sounds pretty good, plenty of information at our finger tips and some very smart ways of training.

But heart rate as a training tool can so easily be better understood.  With Heart Rate levels being pretty unique to the individual and working out training zones often discussed as ‘hit and miss’.  By seeking out a little help and advice, the rewards of training by utilising your own personalised heart rate training zones is very well documented and for those who do, the rewards and improvements speak for themselves.

So to add to the above, we are seeing the introduction of ‘Running Power’ as a measurement.

Is it just another statistic/output – or is it actually something we can (like the cyclists) use, as with time or effort level, to train by?

A very good question.  One which I am still to answer in the entries to follow.

The New Polar Vantage V and M. With both the ‘V’ and ‘M’ comes a massive step up in wrist based heart rate accuracy but also Power with the ‘V’.


If I have your attention – the next part of this post will take a look at ‘Running Power’ as a true metric versus being an output…

Posted in Buzz | Tagged , , , , , | Comments Off on BP – Before Power